ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS DURING PROSTHESIS WITH INDIRECT RESTORATIONS FOR FRONT TEETH

  • O.M. Stupytska Shupyk National Medical Academy of postgraduate education
  • V.V. Chamata Shupyk National Medical Academy of postgraduate education
  • K.I. Pavlenko Shupyk National Medical Academy of postgraduate education
Keywords: veneer, smear layer, adhesion, luting cement.

Abstract

Nowadays the method of teeth restoration with veneers is a leader of the defects of the front teeth removal due to its constructions which are non-invasive and have a good aesthetic. However, such high-precision restorations have a failure rate and complications that are detailed below in the article. The outcomes of porcelain veneers have been studied during a long period. A recent meta-analysis found the summary cumulative survival was 95% at 5 years, 93% at 10 years and 83% at 20 years. The change of the colour, non-satisfaction with restoration shade, postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, bad marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, fractures were common complications for teeth restored with porcelain composite veneers.

Tooth preparation causes the formation of smear layer, which is removed or modified by the adhesive system. In order to achieve a stable bonded interface to dental tissues, adhesive systems have to include three crucial application steps, i.e. etching, priming and bonding. Etching with an acidic solution, such as 35–37% orthophosphoric acid, demineralizes both enamel and dentin surfaces producing roughness and increasing their surface of free energy. With priming, wettability of the tooth surface is increased and hydrophilic monomers and solvents in the primer composition provide substitution for the water on the substrate with the resin monomers. In the bonding step, after penetration and polymerization of monomers onto the etched enamel surface or exposed collagen network in dentin, micromechanical interlocking occurs. Self-etching refers to the acid etching and priming of dentin at the same time with acidic monomers without rinsing resulting in a modified smear layer to form the hybrid layer between the dentin and resin, whereas etch-and-rinse approach refers to acid etching of the enamel/dentin surfaces and after this treatment the surfaces are rinsed in order to eliminate the smear layer and then primer, bond and resin application to form the hybrid layer. Biodegradation of the non-encapsulated collagen fibrils are the main cause of degradation of the hybrid layer and thus of adhesion between the tooth and the restoration. Biodegradation occurs in the hybrid layer and involves consecutive processes. The first stage of biodegradation begins when dentin is acid-etched for removal of the smear layer, exposing the underlying collagen fibril matrix for hybrid layer formation. The second stage involves extraction of the resins that had infiltrated the dentin matrix through water-filled voids within the hybrid layer. The third stage involves enzymatic attack of the exposed collagen fibrils, leading to depletion of collagen fibrils. It has been demonstrated that exposure of collagen matrix by acid etching activates matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), that are known to cause collagenolysis in the presence of water.

To ensure the retention is achieved, good marginal fit, tightness of indirect restorations also largely depends on luting cement. Materials for fixation must be indifferent to the tissues, do not cause the irritation of dentin and pulp, provide strong bond strength results and adhesion, to keep a constant volume and does not deform during curing, get a coefficient of thermal expansion close to the coefficient of expansion of tissues. Marginal adaptation which determined by the shrinkage of the material - it should be minimal, and it also depends on film thickness of luting cement.

The durability of veneers depends on many factors as choosing a design, technology of its manufacture, preparation, and adhesive fixation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Павленко О. В. Формалізація даних обстежень сучасними діагностичними методами в стоматології / О.В. Павленко, О.П. Мінцер, Е.І. Фефер // Дентальні технології. – 2008. – №1. – С. 48- 57.

2. Беда В.И. Ортопедическое лечение с применением адгезивных мостовидных конструкцій / В.И. Беда, М.А. Павленко // Панорама ортопедической стоматологии. – 2008. – №2. – С. 40-48.

3. Шмидсер Э. Эстетика непрямой реставрации / Э. Шмидсер // Новое в стоматологии. – 2007. – №3. – С. 26-35.

4. Гюрель Г. Керамические виниры - искусство и наука / Г. Гюрель. – М., 2008. – 865 с.

5. Кузнецов Д. Л. Клинико-лабораторное обоснование применения виниров непрямого изготовления из композита и прессованной керамики: дис. … канд. мед. наук / Кузнецов Д.Л.; [Твер. гос. мед. акад.]. - Тверь, 2015. - С. 4-38.

6. Жолудев С. Е. Клинические аспекты протезирования дефектов зубов в переднем отделе челюстей / Жолудев С. Е., Ведерникова Л. В. // Проблемы стоматологии. - 2013. - С.36-41.

7. Туати Б. Эстетическая стоматология и керамические реставрации / Туати Б., Миара П., Нэтэнсон Д. – М.: Высшее образование. – С. 428.

8. Рисованная О. Н. Современные лазерные технологии в лечении твердых тканей зуба / О. Н. Рисованная // Кубанский научный медицинский вестник. - 2013. - № 6 (141). - С. 151-155.

9. Mutlu Özcan. Adhesion concepts in dentistry: tooth and material aspects/ Mutlu Özcan, Mine Dündar, M. Erhan Çömlekoğlu//Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. - 2012. - Vol. 26, № 24. - Р. 2661-2681.

10. Bagheri R. Film Thickness and Flow Properties of Resin-Based Cements at Different Temperatures / Bagheri R. //J. Dent. Shiraz Univ. Med. Scien. - 2013. - Vol.14, №2. - Р. 57-63.

11. Postoperative tooth sensitivity with a new self-adhesive resin cement - a randomized clinical trial / Blatz M., Mante F., Saleh N. [ еt al.] // Clinical Oral Investigations. - 2013. -Vol. 17, №3. - Р. 793-8 57-63.

12. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns / [Memarpour M., Mesbahi M., Rezvani G., Rahimi M. ] // Pediatr. Dent. - 2011. - Vol.33, №7. - Р.501-504.
Published
2018-03-21
How to Cite
Stupytska, O., Chamata, V., & Pavlenko, K. (2018). ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS DURING PROSTHESIS WITH INDIRECT RESTORATIONS FOR FRONT TEETH. Ukrainian Dental Almanac, (1), 45-48. Retrieved from https://dental-almanac.org/index.php/journal/article/view/241
Section
ORTHOPEDIC DENTISTRY