REGRESSION MODELS OF INDIVIDUAL LINEAR DIMENSIONS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTING THE CORRECT FORM OF DENTAL ARCH IN YOUNG WOMEN WITH A WIDE FACE, DEPENDING ON THE FEATURES OF ODONTOMETRIC AND CEPHALOMETRIC INDICATORS
Keywords:
young women with normal occlusion close to orthognathic occlusion, wide face type, dental arches, odontometric and cephalometric parameters, regression analysis.
Abstract
The purpose of the study: build and analyze the regression models of computed tomographic parameters necessary to determine the correct shape of dental arches, depending on the odontological and cephalometric parameters for girls with normal occlusion close to orthognathic occlusion and a wide type of face.
Materials and methods: for 20 girls with normal occlusion close to the orthognathic bite and with a wide face type, in the license package "Statistica 6.0" developed regression models of linear sizes necessary for constructing the correct shape of dental arches, depending on odontometric and cephalometric indicators.
Results: thus, in girls with normal occlusion close to orthognathic occlusion, having a wide type of face, all 18 possible reliable regression models (with a coefficient of determination from 0.620 to 0.973) of the reproduction of individual computed tomographic characteristics of the dental arches of upper and lower dental jaws depending on odonto- and cephalometric parameters were developed and analyzed.
Conclusions: the results obtained indicate the need to take into account the type of face when calculating the parameters of dental arches.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Gunas I, Majewski O, Makarchuk I. Features of somatotype and body weight component composition in patients with acne: boys and girls of Podillya region of Ukraine. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences. 2016 Jun 1;29(2):97-100.
2. Cerruto C, Ugolini A, Di Vece L, Doldo T, Caprioglio A, Silvestrini-Biavati A. Cephalometric and dental arch changes to Haas-type rapid maxillary expander anchored to deciduous vs permanent molars: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2017 Sep 1;78(5):385-93.
3. Dmitriev MO, Gunas IV, Dzevulska IV, Glushak AA. Determination of individual teleroentgenographic characteristics of the lower medial incisors position in Ukrainian young men and young women with orthognathic bite. Reports of Morphology. 2018 Sep 27;24(3):19-25.
4. Gunas I, Shinkaruk-Dykovytska MM, Kotsyura OO, Orlovskiy VO, Dmytrenko SV, Shayuk AV, Glushak AA. Differences of craniotype distribution and types of face among apparently healthy men from different regions of Ukraine. Folia morphologica. 2017;76(3):473-7.
5. Gunas ІV, Dmitriev MO, Prokopenko SV, Shinkaruk-Dykovytska MM, Yeroshenko GA. Definition regulatory cephalometric options by the method of Tweed international foundation for Ukrainian boys and girls. World of Medicine and Biology, 2017;13(4):27-31.
6. Jain AR. Comparison of facial form and tooth form between South Indian and Malaysian edentulous patients. Drug Invention Today. 2018 Jun 1;10(6): 874-9.
7. Marchenko AV, Petrushanko TO, Gunas IV. Modeling by regression analysis of the transversal dimensions of the upper and lower jaw and sagittal characteristics of the dental arch in young men, depending on the features of odontometric and cephalometric parameters. Reports of Morphology, 2017;23(1):107-11.
8. Moroz VM, Gunas IV, Serheta IV. Dermatoglyphical and psychophisiological features in practically healthy adolescents of Podilya Region of Ukraine. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine, 2008;7(1):37-45.
9. Dmitriev MO, Gunas IV, Dzevulska IV, Zhulkevych IV. Determination of individual cephalometric characteristics of the occlusal plane in Ukrainian young men and young women with orthognatic bite. Biomedical and Biosocial Anthropology. 2018 Dec 27;(33):5-11.
10. Glushak AA, Gunas IV. Models of individual linear sizes necessary for the construction of the correct form of dental arch in boys and girls with different heads. Ukrainian Scientific and Medical Youth Journal, 2015;(1):34-8.
11. Gunas І, Glushak A, Samoylenko A. Transversal characteristics of dental arch in boys and girls with orthognathic bite depending on the shape of the head and face type. Curr. Issues Pharm. Med. Sci. 2015;28(1):44-7.
12. Маrchenko АV, Gunas ІV, Petrushanko TO, Serebrennikova OА, Trofimenko YY. Computer-tomographic characteristics of root length incisors and canines of the upper and lower jaws in boys and girls with different craniotypes and physiological bite. Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960). 2017;70(3 pt 1):499-502.
13. Peanchitlertkajorn S, Mercado A, Daskalogiannakis J, Hathaway R, Russell K, Semb G, Shaw W, Lamichane M, Fessler J, Long Jr RE. An intercenter comparison of dental arch relationships and craniofacial form including a center using nasoalveolar molding. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2018 Jul;55(6):821-9.
14. Gunas IV, Dmitriev NA, Marchenko AV. Methodological aspects of computed tomography odontomorphometry of boys and girls with the physiological bite. Journal of Education, Health and Sport, 2015;5(11):345-55.
15. Bunak V.V. Anthropometry. Practical course: University manual. Uchpedgiz; 1941.
16. Profit RW, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Modern orthodontics. MEDpress-inform; 2006.
17. Pozur TP. Modeling by regression analysis of the transverse dimensions of the upper and lower jaws and sagittal characteristics of the dental arch in young women with a very wide face, depending on the features of the odonto- and cephalometric indicators. Biomedical and Biosocial Anthropology. 2019; 35:29-37.
18. Bisht M, Rawat P, Madan R, Tripathi S. Anthropometricanalysisof palatalrugaepattern, faceform andarchform among Indianpopulationat Moradabad, India. International Dental Journal of Students Research. 2018 Jun;6:13-7.
19. Farooq A, Mahmood A, Jabbar A. Correlation of inter canine width with vertical facial morphology in patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2015 Jun 1;35(2): 213-5.
20. Grippaudo C, Oliva B, Greco AL, Sferra S, Deli R. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion. Progress in orthodontics. 2013 Dec 1;14(1):43.
21. Khera AK, Singh GK, Sharma VP, Singh A. Relationship between dental arch dimensions and vertical facial morphology in class I subjects. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2012 Dec;46(4_suppl2):316-24.
22. Parameshwaran VN. Masseter Activity, Arch Width and Facial Type. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2010 Mar;44(1):91-5.
23. Rasool G, Afzal S, Bano S, Afzal F, Shahab A, Shah AM. Correlation of intercanine width with sagittal skeletal pattern in untreated orthodontic patients. Pakistan Orthodontic Journal. 2019 Sep 15;11(1):25-8.
24. Traconis LB, Santana YG, Ruiz GE, Carvajal AM. Correlation of facial profile and dental arches in a population of Yucatan. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia. 2016 Apr 1;4(2):e81-4.
2. Cerruto C, Ugolini A, Di Vece L, Doldo T, Caprioglio A, Silvestrini-Biavati A. Cephalometric and dental arch changes to Haas-type rapid maxillary expander anchored to deciduous vs permanent molars: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2017 Sep 1;78(5):385-93.
3. Dmitriev MO, Gunas IV, Dzevulska IV, Glushak AA. Determination of individual teleroentgenographic characteristics of the lower medial incisors position in Ukrainian young men and young women with orthognathic bite. Reports of Morphology. 2018 Sep 27;24(3):19-25.
4. Gunas I, Shinkaruk-Dykovytska MM, Kotsyura OO, Orlovskiy VO, Dmytrenko SV, Shayuk AV, Glushak AA. Differences of craniotype distribution and types of face among apparently healthy men from different regions of Ukraine. Folia morphologica. 2017;76(3):473-7.
5. Gunas ІV, Dmitriev MO, Prokopenko SV, Shinkaruk-Dykovytska MM, Yeroshenko GA. Definition regulatory cephalometric options by the method of Tweed international foundation for Ukrainian boys and girls. World of Medicine and Biology, 2017;13(4):27-31.
6. Jain AR. Comparison of facial form and tooth form between South Indian and Malaysian edentulous patients. Drug Invention Today. 2018 Jun 1;10(6): 874-9.
7. Marchenko AV, Petrushanko TO, Gunas IV. Modeling by regression analysis of the transversal dimensions of the upper and lower jaw and sagittal characteristics of the dental arch in young men, depending on the features of odontometric and cephalometric parameters. Reports of Morphology, 2017;23(1):107-11.
8. Moroz VM, Gunas IV, Serheta IV. Dermatoglyphical and psychophisiological features in practically healthy adolescents of Podilya Region of Ukraine. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine, 2008;7(1):37-45.
9. Dmitriev MO, Gunas IV, Dzevulska IV, Zhulkevych IV. Determination of individual cephalometric characteristics of the occlusal plane in Ukrainian young men and young women with orthognatic bite. Biomedical and Biosocial Anthropology. 2018 Dec 27;(33):5-11.
10. Glushak AA, Gunas IV. Models of individual linear sizes necessary for the construction of the correct form of dental arch in boys and girls with different heads. Ukrainian Scientific and Medical Youth Journal, 2015;(1):34-8.
11. Gunas І, Glushak A, Samoylenko A. Transversal characteristics of dental arch in boys and girls with orthognathic bite depending on the shape of the head and face type. Curr. Issues Pharm. Med. Sci. 2015;28(1):44-7.
12. Маrchenko АV, Gunas ІV, Petrushanko TO, Serebrennikova OА, Trofimenko YY. Computer-tomographic characteristics of root length incisors and canines of the upper and lower jaws in boys and girls with different craniotypes and physiological bite. Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960). 2017;70(3 pt 1):499-502.
13. Peanchitlertkajorn S, Mercado A, Daskalogiannakis J, Hathaway R, Russell K, Semb G, Shaw W, Lamichane M, Fessler J, Long Jr RE. An intercenter comparison of dental arch relationships and craniofacial form including a center using nasoalveolar molding. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2018 Jul;55(6):821-9.
14. Gunas IV, Dmitriev NA, Marchenko AV. Methodological aspects of computed tomography odontomorphometry of boys and girls with the physiological bite. Journal of Education, Health and Sport, 2015;5(11):345-55.
15. Bunak V.V. Anthropometry. Practical course: University manual. Uchpedgiz; 1941.
16. Profit RW, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Modern orthodontics. MEDpress-inform; 2006.
17. Pozur TP. Modeling by regression analysis of the transverse dimensions of the upper and lower jaws and sagittal characteristics of the dental arch in young women with a very wide face, depending on the features of the odonto- and cephalometric indicators. Biomedical and Biosocial Anthropology. 2019; 35:29-37.
18. Bisht M, Rawat P, Madan R, Tripathi S. Anthropometricanalysisof palatalrugaepattern, faceform andarchform among Indianpopulationat Moradabad, India. International Dental Journal of Students Research. 2018 Jun;6:13-7.
19. Farooq A, Mahmood A, Jabbar A. Correlation of inter canine width with vertical facial morphology in patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2015 Jun 1;35(2): 213-5.
20. Grippaudo C, Oliva B, Greco AL, Sferra S, Deli R. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion. Progress in orthodontics. 2013 Dec 1;14(1):43.
21. Khera AK, Singh GK, Sharma VP, Singh A. Relationship between dental arch dimensions and vertical facial morphology in class I subjects. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2012 Dec;46(4_suppl2):316-24.
22. Parameshwaran VN. Masseter Activity, Arch Width and Facial Type. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2010 Mar;44(1):91-5.
23. Rasool G, Afzal S, Bano S, Afzal F, Shahab A, Shah AM. Correlation of intercanine width with sagittal skeletal pattern in untreated orthodontic patients. Pakistan Orthodontic Journal. 2019 Sep 15;11(1):25-8.
24. Traconis LB, Santana YG, Ruiz GE, Carvajal AM. Correlation of facial profile and dental arches in a population of Yucatan. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia. 2016 Apr 1;4(2):e81-4.
Published
2020-06-26
How to Cite
Shinkaruk-DykovytskaМ. М., Pozur, T. P., Koliadenko, S. V., Orlovskiy, V. O., & Galunko, G. M. (2020). REGRESSION MODELS OF INDIVIDUAL LINEAR DIMENSIONS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTING THE CORRECT FORM OF DENTAL ARCH IN YOUNG WOMEN WITH A WIDE FACE, DEPENDING ON THE FEATURES OF ODONTOMETRIC AND CEPHALOMETRIC INDICATORS. Ukrainian Dental Almanac, (2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.31718/2409-0255.2.2020.14
Section
ORTHODONTICS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
