DETERMINATION OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH CONGENITAL CLEFT OF THE UPPER LIP AND PALATE BEFORE AND AFTER THEIR ORTHOPEDIC REHABILITATION

  • M. Y. Oliinyk Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
Keywords: Congenital cleft of the upper lip and palate; orthopaedic rehabilitation; life quality related to oral health.

Abstract

Abstract. Congenital malformations remain one of the most pressing medical and social problems, and their frequency is an important characteristic of the population health status. Unfortunately, the tendency to their decrease is not observed in recent years, on average from 450 to 500 newborns per year. In this regard, it is important to study different aspects of the life quality of patients of different ages and with different types of congenital malformations of the upper lip and palate.

The positive dynamics of changes in the life quality can be evidenced by the survey data of these patients, which must be conducted after each stage of their rehabilitation with the use of special validated questionnaires.

Objective. The aim of the study was to assess the life quality of patients with congenital malformations of the upper lip and palate before and after the final stage of orthopedic treatment with different types of aesthetic designs of dentures.

Material and methods. An investigation of the life quality related to the oral health was proposed using data of 37 patients aged 17 to 36 years, including 26 men and 11 women with congenital malformations of the upper lip and palate, using the OHIP-14 (Oral health impact profile) questionnaire. Non-removable structures are made for 27 patients, combined (non-removable + removable) - for 10 patients. The questionnaire was conducted before treatment and one month after their orthopaedic its completion.

The analysis was conducted on individual questions, which were grouped into separate blocks: questions related to problems with eating, questions related to communication problems, questions related to problems in everyday life.

Research results. There was a significant improvement in the life quality of patients with congenital malformations of the upper lip and palate after completion of their orthopaedic rehabilitation as separate blocks of questions (Block I 12,703 ± 0,915 before, against 1,784 ± 0,165 after orthopaedic treatment; Block II 13,378 ± 0,672 before, against 1,405 ± 0,175 after orthopaedic treatment; Block III 9,919 ± 0,736 before, against 0,676 ± 0,155 after orthopaedic treatment), confirmed by statistical processing of the material (p <0,001) as well as the total number of points in the questionnaires (95,142 ± 1,405 before, against 10,214 ± 1,209 after orthopaedic treatment; p <0,001).

It should be considered that the life quality of patients with congenital malformations of the upper lip and palate, as well as other dental patients is a non-permanent category. It usually changes with age, as well as a result of treatment and prevention measures, so it must always be assessed in the dynamics. As a rule, successful treatment improves the life quality.

Inadequate aesthetic condition of the oral cavity, which is formed after a comprehensive treatment, along with the functions of chewing and speech, most significantly affects the life quality.

Thus, a study of the life quality associated with oral health of patients in this category suggests that adequate orthopaedic rehabilitation can significantly improve their life quality. In addition, the presence of either a fixed or a combined prosthesis, including in the area of the split (mouthpiece) aesthetically raises the upper lip and allows you to perform additional plastic surgery on it if necessary.

Conclusion. The life quality of patients with congenital malformations of the upper lip and palate associated with oral health is usually a temporary category and tends to change depending on the type of split, time and method of rehabilitation, especially orthopedic treatment. Adequate and high-quality prosthetics of defects and deformations of the teeth rows can significantly improve both the subjective assessment of the life quality and the objective improvement of the functional state of the dental-jaw system, as evidenced by these objective research methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, Dixon MJ, Shaw WC. Cleft lip and palate. The Lancet. 2009;374:1773–85.

2. Prykhodjko T. A. Vrodzheni shhilyny ghuby i/abo pidnebinnja: poshyrenistj sered novonarodzhenykh i chynnyky ryzyku vynyknennja  [avtoreferat]. Kharkiv; 2007. 14 s. (Ukrainian).

3. Vodolaczkij MP, Evsev`eva ME, Rekvava ZA. Fenotipicheskij analiz detej s vrozhdyonnoj rasshhelinoj verkhnej guby i nyoba. Stomatologiya. 2008;1:74–6. (Russian).

4. Kharjkov LV, Jakovenko LM, Sobko AV, Docenko OS. Vrodzheni syndromy u ditej, shho suprovodzhujutjsja nezroshhennjam verkhnjoji ghuby i pidnebinnja (epidemiologhija, pryncypy ta etapnistj likuvannja). Novyny stomatologhiji. 2008;1:26-31. (Ukrainian).

5. Kharkov LV, Timen GYe, Yakovenko LM, Yegorov RI. Patogenetychni zvyazky zaxvoryuvan lor-organiv z vrodzhenymy nezroshhennyamy verxn`oyi guby ta pidnebinnya. Zhurnal vushnyx, nosovyx i gorlovyx xvorob. 2015;1;59–65. (Ukrainian).

6. Serdjuk AM. Medyko-ekologhichni peredumovy demoghrafichnoji kryzy v Ukrajini ta shljakhy jikh podolannja. Zhurnal AMN Ukrajiny. 2007;13(3):486–502. (Ukrainian).

7. Shakirova PP, Pogudina LV. Patologiya okklyuzii u detej s porokami razvitiya chelyustno-liczevoj oblasti. Ortodontiya. 2011;1:24–7. (Russian).

8. Gordiyuk NM, Bojko GG, Anisimova LA, Belyaeva IV, Davydov NN, Fedorchenko AV. Psikhoterapevticheskij podkhod pri rozhdenii rebenka s vrozhdyonnoj chelyustno-liczevoj patologiej. Visnik stomatologiyi. 2010; 2: 9. (Russian).

9. Piombino P, Ruggiero F, Dell’Aversana Orabona G, Scopelliti D, Bianchi A, De Simone F, et al. Development and Validation of the Quality-of-Life Adolescent Cleft Questionnaire in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate. J Craniofac Surg [Internet]. 2014;25(5):1757–61. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001665-201409000-00039

10. Areva GT. Stomatologicheskij status, stomatologicheskoe zdorove i kachestvo zhizni u paczientov pozhilogo i starcheskogo vozrasta (chast 1). Parodontologiya. 2013;2:63–8. (Russian).

11. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual life Res an Int J Qual life Asp Treat care Rehabil. 1993;2(2):153–9.

12. World Health Organization (WHO) The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) group. 2017 [Internet] [cited 2020 Sep 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/whoqol/en/

13. Antonarakis GS, Patel RN, Tompson B. Oral health-related quality of life in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients: a systematic review. Community Dent Health [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Sep 15];30(3):189–95. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24151795

14. Bos A, Prahl C. Oral health-related quality of life in Dutch children with cleft lip and/or palate. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(5):865–71.

15. Cassio E, Raposo-do-A, Evelyn K, Nivaldo A. Quality of life among children with cleft lips and palates: a critical review of measurement instruments. Brazilian J Plast Surg. 2011;26(4):639–44.

16. Kan VV, Kapitonov VF, Lazarenko AV. Metody oczenki kachestva zhizni u paczientov stomatologicheskogo profilya. Sovremennye issledovaniya soczialnykh problem. 2012;10:60. (Russian).

17. Perepelkina NYu, Shmatov KV. Ispolzovanie dvukh metodik dlya oczenki kachestva zhizni paczientov posle vypolneniya u nikh protezirovaniya zubov. Obshhestvennoe zdorove i zdravookhranenie. 2012;2:12–3. (Russian).

18. Yushhuk ND, Maev IV. Gurevich KG. Zdorovyj obraz zhizni i profilaktika zabolevanij. Moskva: izdatelst. «Pero»; 2015. – 649 s. (Russian).

19. Munz SM, Edwards SP, Inglehart MR. Oral health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment and treatment outcomes of adolescents/young adults with cleft lip/palate: An exploration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(8):790–6.

20. Gileva OS, Libik TV, Khalilaeva EV, Danilov KV, Khalyavina IN, Gileva ES, Sadilova VA, Plenkina YuA, Khokhrin DV. Stomatologicheskoe zdorove v kriteriyakh kachestva zhizni. Mediczinskij vestnik Bashkortostana. 2011;3:6–11. (Russian).

21. Arkharova ON. Izuchenie kachestva zhizni paczientov s zubochelyustnymi anomaliyami do nachala ikh ortodonticheskoj korrekczii. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2015;4(76):60–3. (Russian).

22. Klassen AF, Tsangaris E, Forrest CR, Wong KW, Pusic AL, Cano SJ, et al. Quality of life of children treated for cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 Sep 15];65(5):547–57. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=medl&AN=22118856%255Cnhttp://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk:4550/resserv?sid=OVID:medline&id=pmid:22118856&id=doi:10.1016%252Fj.bjps.2011.11.004&issn=1748-6815&isbn=&volume =65&issue=5&spage=547&pages

23. Pisek A, Pitiphat W, Chowchuen B, Pradubwong S. Oral health status and oral impacts on quality of life in early adolescent cleft patients. J Med Assoc Thail [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Sep 15];97(Suppl 1):S7-16. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=medl&AN=25816532%255Cnhttp://openurl.ac.uk/athens:_edu//lfp/LinkFinderPlus/Display?sid=OVID:Ovid+MEDLINE(R)&id=pmid:25816532&id=&issn=0125-2208&isbn=&volume=97&issue=10&spage=S7&pages=S7-

24. De Queiroz Herkrath APC, Herkrath FJ, Rebelo MAB, Vettore MV. Determinants of health-related and oral health-related quality of life in adults with orofacial clefts: A cross-sectional study. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2018;55(9):1244–57.

25. Blinder AZh. Mezhdiscziplinarnyj podkhod k lecheniyu detej s dvustoronnej rasshhelinoj guby i neba [avtoreferat]. Moskva; 2017. 23 s. (Russian).

26. Arkharova ON, Nimaev AB, Khasyanov AI. Znachenie kriteriev kachestva zhizni dlya kompleksnogo podkhoda k diagnostike i lecheniyu stomatologicheskikh zabolevanij. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2015;3 (75):62–6. (Russian).

27. Lapina NV, Skorikov YuV, Arinkina AS, Akopova VA. Dinamika pokazatelej kachestva zhizni bolnykh s soputstvuyushhimi zabolevaniyami v proczesse stomatologicheskoj ortopedicheskoj reabilitaczii. Kubanskij nauchnyj mediczinskij vestnik. 2013;6:114–7. (Russian).

28. Stelzle F, Rohde M, Oetter N, Krug K, Riemann M, Adler W, et al. Gingival esthetics and oral health-related quality of life in patients with cleft lip and palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(8):993–9.
Published
2020-12-23
How to Cite
Oliinyk, M. Y. (2020). DETERMINATION OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH CONGENITAL CLEFT OF THE UPPER LIP AND PALATE BEFORE AND AFTER THEIR ORTHOPEDIC REHABILITATION. Ukrainian Dental Almanac, (4), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.31718/2409-0255.4.2020.11
Section
ORTHOPEDIC DENTISTRY